What is the next main phase that occurs after the inquiry in response to a research misconduct allegation if there is sufficient evidence to proceed?

The next main phase that occurs after the inquiry into a research misconduct allegation is an investigation, especially when sufficient evidence has been found to warrant a deeper examination.

During the inquiry phase, an initial assessment takes place to determine if there is enough evidence to suggest that misconduct might have occurred. If the inquiry concludes that there is credible evidence supporting the allegations, the process advances to the investigation stage. This stage involves a thorough and systematic gathering of evidence, interviews, and a detailed analysis of the circumstances surrounding the alleged misconduct. The investigation aims to ascertain the facts and determine whether any research misconduct has indeed taken place.

In contrast, mediation and arbitration are methods used to resolve disputes but are not formal processes for handling allegations of misconduct. These processes do not involve the thorough fact-finding that follows an inquiry. Similarly, the term resolution refers more generally to the outcome of a dispute or misconduct case rather than a specific phase in the process following an inquiry. Therefore, the investigation is a critical next step in ensuring an objective evaluation and addressing the allegations effectively.